Re: [PATCH 0/2] tree-walk improvements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 12:43 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> David Turner <novalis@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > The first patch is a re-roll of Peff's patch from 2014 -- here's
> > the archive message:
> >
> > http://git.661346.n2.nabble.com/PATCH-tree-walk-be-more-specific-about-corrupt-tree-errors-td7603558.html
> >
> > Not sure why this wasn't applied then, but I thought it looked pretty
> > good, so I added a few tests.
> 
> Thanks.  Adding tests is very much appreciated.  I however wonder
> why you needed to reword a perfectly readable "truncated" to
> something else, though?

Because truncated, to me, means "something that has been cut off". Here,
the recorded length is too short, so it's probably not the case that
something was cut off -- it was never right to begin with.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]