Re: [PATCH 2/2] fsck: handle bad trees like other errors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> To prevent further headaches in this directory, can we have
> .gitattributes that tells us that everything in there are binary
> files?  Something like the attached.
>
> The other object was transferred as a binary patch, but I have no
> faith in what I applied from your e-mail message for this file that
> went though latin-1 to utf-8 conversion X-<.
>
>  t/t1450/bad-objects/.gitattributes | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/t/t1450/bad-objects/.gitattributes b/t/t1450/bad-objects/.gitattributes
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..a173f27
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/t/t1450/bad-objects/.gitattributes
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +[0-9a-f]*[0-9a-f]	-diff

I suspect that the t/t1007 directory in 1/2 may deserve a similar
treatment.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]