Re: [PATCH 0/2] tree-walk improvements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Turner <novalis@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> The first patch is a re-roll of Peff's patch from 2014 -- here's
> the archive message:
>
> http://git.661346.n2.nabble.com/PATCH-tree-walk-be-more-specific-about-corrupt-tree-errors-td7603558.html
>
> Not sure why this wasn't applied then, but I thought it looked pretty
> good, so I added a few tests.

Thanks.  Adding tests is very much appreciated.  I however wonder
why you needed to reword a perfectly readable "truncated" to
something else, though?

> Email address note 1: my employer wants me to use my company address,
> but not my company computer, for patches I write on work time.  This
> means that I'm going to continue corresponding from
> novalis@xxxxxxxxxxx, but will send patches with the @twosigma.com
> address in the author line.

That seems like not an uncommon practice ;-)

> Email address note 2: I'm not subscribed to the mailing list these
> days, so please CC me (at novalis@xxxxxxxxxxx) on replies.

It is good to tell others this, but I suspect that it is known by
those who are likely to respond to these messages that always CC'ing
to individual is the norm on this list ;-)

Thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]