David Turner <novalis@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > The first patch is a re-roll of Peff's patch from 2014 -- here's > the archive message: > > http://git.661346.n2.nabble.com/PATCH-tree-walk-be-more-specific-about-corrupt-tree-errors-td7603558.html > > Not sure why this wasn't applied then, but I thought it looked pretty > good, so I added a few tests. Thanks. Adding tests is very much appreciated. I however wonder why you needed to reword a perfectly readable "truncated" to something else, though? > Email address note 1: my employer wants me to use my company address, > but not my company computer, for patches I write on work time. This > means that I'm going to continue corresponding from > novalis@xxxxxxxxxxx, but will send patches with the @twosigma.com > address in the author line. That seems like not an uncommon practice ;-) > Email address note 2: I'm not subscribed to the mailing list these > days, so please CC me (at novalis@xxxxxxxxxxx) on replies. It is good to tell others this, but I suspect that it is known by those who are likely to respond to these messages that always CC'ing to individual is the norm on this list ;-) Thanks.