Re: [PATCH v2 05/38] refs: create a base class "ref_store" for files_ref_store

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 05:53 +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> On 09/04/2016 10:40 PM, David Turner wrote:
> > On Sun, 2016-09-04 at 18:08 +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> > 
> >> +/* A linked list of ref_stores for submodules: */
> >> +static struct ref_store *submodule_ref_stores;
> > 
> > I don't like the per-submodule stores being in a linked list, which
> > requires a linear search.  Stefan has, I think, been doing a bunch of
> > work to scale git to support on the order of thousands of submodules,
> > which this potentially breaks.  What about a hashmap?
> 
> I agree it's not ideal, but this linked list is not new. Before this
> patch the same code was in `files-backend.c`, and before patch [03/38]
> essentially the same linked list was stored as `submodule_ref_caches`.
> So this is not a regression, and I'd rather not address it in this patch
> series.

Fair enough!




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]