Re: [PATCH 20/22] sequencer: remember do_recursive_merge()'s return value

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



W dniu 29.08.2016 o 10:06, Johannes Schindelin pisze:

> diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
> index 5ec956f..0614b90 100644
> --- a/sequencer.c
> +++ b/sequencer.c
> @@ -623,7 +623,7 @@ static int do_pick_commit(enum todo_command command, struct commit *commit,
>  	const char *base_label, *next_label;
>  	struct commit_message msg = { NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL };
>  	struct strbuf msgbuf = STRBUF_INIT;
> -	int res, unborn = 0, allow;
> +	int res = 0, unborn = 0, allow;

Not that I am against this part of change, making initialization
explicit, but why we are initializing automatic variables with 0,
which would be the default value anyway?  I thought our coding
guidelines discourage initializing with 0 or NULL...

Puzzled,
-- 
Jakub Narębski




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]