Re: [PATCH v2 05/14] sequencer: lib'ify do_pick_commit()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

> Instead of dying there, let the caller high up in the callchain notice
> the error and handle it (by dying, still).
>
> The only two callers of do_pick_commit(), pick_commits() and
> single_pick() already check the return value and pass it on to their
> callers, so their callers must be already prepared to handle error
> returns, and with this step, we make it notice an error return from
> this function.
>
> So this is a safe conversion to make do_pick_commit() callable from
> new callers that want it not to die, without changing the external
> behaviour of anything existing.
>
> While at it, remove the superfluous space.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx>
> ---
>  sequencer.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
> index f6cdf65..7eef512 100644
> --- a/sequencer.c
> +++ b/sequencer.c
> @@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ static int do_pick_commit(struct commit *commit, struct replay_opts *opts)
>  		 * to work on.
>  		 */
>  		if (write_cache_as_tree(head, 0, NULL))
> -			die (_("Your index file is unmerged."));
> +			return error(_("Your index file is unmerged."));

Makes sense.

do_pick_commit() still calls fast_forward_to(), which was silently
half libified in 3/14 but can still die in checkout_fast_forward(),
though.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]