Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> But submission is less important than review. And for review it is >> usually better (except gigantic series) to have patch text for review >> with the review. > > Agreed. However, submission typically requires more work than review, > because the patch text must remain applicable. For review, as long as > the email client you use to respond doesn't do something horrible like > *re-wrap* the quoted patch text, the result will work as a review. Yup. That is why we say "please send patch inline; when asked to send it as an attachment, please do so". -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html