Re: patch submission process, was Re: [PATCH v6 06/16] merge_recursive: abort properly upon errors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 4:59 AM, Johannes Schindelin
<Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I disagree, however, with the suggestion to sift through your `pu` branch
> and to somehow replace local branches with the commits found there.

To be more in line with the "e-mailed patch" workflow, I think what I should
do is to send the version I queued with fixups back to the list as follow-up.
Just like reviewers review, the maintainer reviews and queues, the original
author should be able to work in the same workflow, i.e. reading and applying
an improved version of the patch from her mailbox.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]