Re: [PATCH v6 06/16] merge_recursive: abort properly upon errors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Junio,

On Mon, 1 Aug 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 06/16] merge_recursive: abort properly upon errors
> 
> s/merge_/merge-/; for this one alone.

I see that de8946de1694a8cf311daab7b2c416d76cb04d23 still shows it with an
underscore instead of a dash, while you fixed my other tyops in this patch
series.

I tend to think that the underscore is correct: this change is not so much
about the builtin (which is written with a dash) but about the function
(written with an underscore, used by more than just merge-recursive, e.g.
cherry-pick).

> > There are a couple of places where return values never indicated errors
> > before, as wie simply died instead of returning.
> 
> s/wie/we/;

Right. What can I say, I am surrounded by too many Germans.

I fixed this locally, in case another re-roll should be required. What you
have in `pu` looks correct to me, though. Let me know if you want me to
re-submit nevertheless.

BTW I should have said this earlier: I run all my rebases, all my merges,
all my cherry-picks using a Git version with these patches for months (of
course, the patches have changed, but not in the most critical parts I was
concerned about, the parts where die() calls were replaced). If I would
have found any regression, I would have notified you immediately, of
course.

Ciao,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]