Re: [PATCH v6 06/16] merge_recursive: abort properly upon errors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

> I tend to think that the underscore is correct: this change is not so much
> about the builtin (which is written with a dash) but about the function
> (written with an underscore, used by more than just merge-recursive, e.g.
> cherry-pick).

Yes, I agree.  "merge-recursive:" prefix is about either the
built-in command, or the machinery as a whole to support that
built-in command.  It is preferrable to use "merge_recursive():"
if we are talking about a single function.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]