Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 10:34:11AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> It may be a good UI that is optimized for drive-by contributors. It >> is just that it is not very well suited (compared to mailing list >> discussions) to conduct high-volume exchange of ideas and changes >> efficiently. > > I think that's something to ponder; can we have a workflow where > drive-by contributors can use something that has a lower learning/setup > curve, but long-term contributors might opt for something more powerful? > > I think SubmitGit is a step in that direction. Yes, agreed 100% with that. The author of the tool must be praised by getting added to the Cc: line in this discussion ;-) > It does still require > switching to the mailing list for subsequent conversation, though. It > would be interesting to see something like SubmitGit that puts its own > email in the "From", and that processes email replies into PR comments, > and then subsequent PR comments into emails (i.e., part of my "dream tool" > from earlier). It's not clear to me whether the result would just end up > being irritating for both sides to use (because it doesn't _quite_ > conform to the norms of each format). But it would be fun to find out. Perhaps. I do not know if I like that second and subsequent steps for SubmitGit, but its first step as currently deployed I am very happy with. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html