On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 06:36:46PM +0530, Mehul Jain wrote: > diff --git a/Documentation/git-log.txt b/Documentation/git-log.txt > index 03f9580..f39f800 100644 > --- a/Documentation/git-log.txt > +++ b/Documentation/git-log.txt > @@ -196,6 +196,10 @@ log.showRoot:: > `git log -p` output would be shown without a diff attached. > The default is `true`. > > +log.showSignature:: > + If `true`, `git log` and `git show` will act as if `--show-signature` > + option was passed to them. This should be: ...if the `--show-signature` option was... or: ...if `--show-signature` was... Either is correct; you just need an article when not referring directly to the option by its name. The documentation here mentions "log" and "show". But I think this will affect other programs, too, including "whatchanged" and "reflog". Those ones are probably good, but the documentation is a little misleading (I think other options just say "git-log and related commands" or something). I thought at first it would affect format-patch, too, which would be weird. But in that command we _do_ parse the variable and end up setting default_show_signature, but we never call cmd_log_init_defaults(), which is what copies that value into the rev_info struct. That's kind of a weird way to split it, but it's certainly not something you introduced here. > diff --git a/t/t4202-log.sh b/t/t4202-log.sh > index 128ba93..36be9a1 100755 > --- a/t/t4202-log.sh > +++ b/t/t4202-log.sh > @@ -890,6 +890,25 @@ test_expect_success GPG 'log --graph --show-signature for merged tag' ' > grep "^| | gpg: Good signature" actual > ' > > +test_expect_success GPG 'log.showsignature=true behaves like --show-signature' ' > + git checkout -b test_sign master && > + echo foo >foo && > + git add foo && > + git commit -S -m signed_commit && > + test_config log.showsignature true && > + git log -1 signed >actual && > + test_i18ngrep "gpg: Signature made" actual && > + test_i18ngrep "gpg: Good signature" actual > +' You can see in the context that we do not use test_i18ngrep for finding gpg output in existing tests. I'm not sure if the new tests should be consistent, or if they should be changed to use test_i18ngrep. I don't think it's actually doing anything here, though. It's used with a git-specific GETTEXT_POISON flag that tweaks the output generated by git, but not by sub-programs like gpg. > +test_expect_success GPG '--show-signature overrides log.showsignature=false' ' > + test_when_finished "git reset --hard && git checkout master" && > + git config log.showsignature false && Should this be test_config? > +test_expect_success GPG 'log.showsignature behaves like --show-signature' ' > + git config log.showsignature true && Ditto here. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html