Re: [PATCH 2/2] Implement a simple delta_base cache

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 17 Mar 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> 
> 
> On Sat, 17 Mar 2007, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > 
> > This is definitely an area where pack v4 will bring that cost down to 
> > zero.
> 
> Heh. I believe that when I see it. The thing is, unless you re-generate 
> the tree object data structures, you'll have to have totally different 
> tree walkers for different tree types, and it will all be quite ugly and 
> complex. And "ugly and complex" seldom translates into "zero cost".

Well... in my opinion it is the _current_ tree walker that is quite ugly 
and complex.  It is always messier to parse strings than fixed width 
binary fields.


Nicolas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]