Re: cleaner/better zlib sources?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> > This one seems to do benchmarking with 8MB buffers if I read it right 
> > (didn't try).
> 
> Yes, I just wanted to have the biggest time spent in inflate(). That why I 
> use a big buffer.

Right. But if the biggest time is spent in setup, the big-buffer thing 
ends up being exactly the wrong thing to test ;)

> Definitely. The nature of the data matters.
> Did you try to make a zlib with my patch and oprofile git on real data 
> with that?

I haven't actually set it up so that I can build against my own zlib yet. 
Exactly because I was hoping that somebody would already have a solution 
;)

Will try to do later today, although since it's the kids school 
conferences today I'll effectively be in and out all day long.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]