Re: [PATCH v12 03/13] ref-filter: introduce the ref_formatting_state stack machinery

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> You replaced the quote_style argument with ref_formatting_state, and I
>> think you should have kept this argument and added ref_formatting_state.
>> The other option is to add an extra indirection like
>>
>> struct ref_formatting_state {
>> 	int quote_style;
>> 	struct ref_formatting_stack *stack;
>> }
>>
>> (ref_formatting_stack would be what you currently call
>> ref_formatting_state). But that's probably overkill.
>
> I think this is the right way to go.  As you explained in your later
> messages, this is conceptually a global setting that applies to
> anybody working in the callchain and not something individual
> recursion levels would want to muck with.

The fact that this is conceptually a global setting does not change,
but I think the deeper levels should not care or even _know_ that
language-specific quoting rules exist (see other post).

Sorry for the confusion.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]