Re: [PATCH v6 01/10] ref-filter: introduce 'ref_formatting_state'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Matthieu Moy
<Matthieu.Moy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> -static void print_value(struct atom_value *v, int quote_style)
>> +static void apply_formatting_state(struct ref_formatting_state *state,
>> +                                struct atom_value *v, struct strbuf *value)
>>  {
>> -     struct strbuf sb = STRBUF_INIT;
>> -     switch (quote_style) {
>> +     /*  Eventually we'll formatt based on the ref_formatting_state */
>
> s/formatt/format/
>
> Also, we usually use a single space after /*.
>
> (Neither is very important since it disapears in the next commit)
>
>> +     /*
>> +      * Some (pesudo) atoms have no immediate side effect, but only
>
> s/pesudo/pseudo/. But if you are to rename these atoms to "modifier
> atoms", you should get rid of this "pseudo" here.
>

Ah, I hate making grammatical errors, Even though I check it always gets away.
Anyways waiting for Junio and others to reply on this version. Could do a resend
for this series if needed.


-- 
Regards,
Karthik Nayak
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]