Re: [PATCH 2/2] connect: improve check for plink to reduce false positives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Peff,

On 2015-04-23 17:53, Jeff King wrote:

> What about "plink-0.83" that was mentioned earlier in the thread?

I was working a lot with Java projects where the base name is often considered to be the part before a version number that is encoded into the file name, so I think it would be a good idea here, too. Essentially, it would be the regex

    ^(.*[/\\])?plink(-.*|\.exe)$

... and maybe we should actually do exactly this, use a regex? I know that many developers try to stay away from them, but if you can read them, they are an efficient encoding of expectations.

Ciao,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]