Hi Junio, On Tue, 23 Dec 2014, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > > > On Tue, 23 Dec 2014, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > >> Having said that, I think "missingTags" etc. should not be > >> configuration variable names (instead, they should be values). > >> > >> Because of that, I do not think we need consistency between the way > >> these "tokens that denote kinds of errors fsck denotes" are spelled > >> and the way "configuration variable names" are spelled. > > > > Okay. That makes more sense. > > I am sorry that I didn't step back and think about it earlier to notice > that we shouldn't be talking about configuration variable name syntax. > I could have saved us time going back and forth if I did so earlier. Do not worry. You were just trying to make this software better, same as I tried. Unfortunately, I will not be able to submit v2 of this patch series this year, but I will do so in the second week of January (including the change to the global array with the default severity levels because I do want to see this feature integrated). Ciao, Dscho -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html