Re: [PATCH 16/18] fsck: support demoting errors to warnings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Junio,

On Tue, 23 Dec 2014, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Having said that, I think "missingTags" etc. should not be configuration
> variable names (instead, they should be values).
> 
> Because of that, I do not think we need consistency between the way
> these "tokens that denote kinds of errors fsck denotes" are spelled and
> the way "configuration variable names" are spelled.

Okay. That makes more sense.

Now I can remove the complexity introduced by teaching the parser to
accept camelCased values, and we're golden.

> In either case, I'd recommend that we take [ ,]+ as inter-token
> separator to ease the use on the command line and config file

And this is indeed the case:

+void fsck_strict_mode(struct fsck_options *options, const char *mode)
+...
+       while (*mode) {
+               int len = strcspn(mode, " ,|"), equal, msg_id;
+...

In other words, I even allowed the pipe symbol as separator.

Ciao,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]