Re: [PATCH 16/18] fsck: support demoting errors to warnings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

> Hi Junio,
>
> On Tue, 23 Dec 2014, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Having said that, I think "missingTags" etc. should not be configuration
>> variable names (instead, they should be values).
>> 
>> Because of that, I do not think we need consistency between the way
>> these "tokens that denote kinds of errors fsck denotes" are spelled and
>> the way "configuration variable names" are spelled.
>
> Okay. That makes more sense.

I am sorry that I didn't step back and think about it earlier to
notice that we shouldn't be talking about configuration variable
name syntax.  I could have saved us time going back and forth if
I did so earlier.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]