Re: [PATCH 00/13] mingw unicode environment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 17.07.2014 21:00, schrieb Stepan Kasal:
> Hi,
> 
>> Karsten Blees <karsten.blees@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>> I believe we prefer moving code to the right place over forward
>>> declarations (IIRC I got bashed for the latter in one of the first rounds
>>> of this patch series). If only to justify 'git-blame -M' :-D
> 
> indeed, my position is the same, generally.
> 
> But it turned out that the current ordering is sane, mostly works as it is,
> and I needed _only one_ fwd decl to make things compile.  This is why I
> decided to have things arranged this way.
> 

Fine with me.

However, if it *did* compile for you, I wonder where ALLOC_GROW (as of #02/13)
and alloc_nr (as of #10/13) came from? Or did we recently remove '#include "cache.h"'
from upstream mingw.c?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]