Re: [PATCH 00/13] mingw unicode environment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

> Karsten Blees <karsten.blees@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > I believe we prefer moving code to the right place over forward
> > declarations (IIRC I got bashed for the latter in one of the first rounds
> > of this patch series). If only to justify 'git-blame -M' :-D

indeed, my position is the same, generally.

But it turned out that the current ordering is sane, mostly works as it is,
and I needed _only one_ fwd decl to make things compile.  This is why I
decided to have things arranged this way.

If anyone thinks the resulting ordering is not OK, they can propose
one re-order patch on top of this series.

Junio wrote:
> OK, so the series may need further re-polishing of the polishing
> done by Stepan last-minute before sending them out.  I'll still

No, it was not last minute work.  It was done several weeks ago, after some
planning, etc.  It's my best.  Corrections welcome, though.

Stepan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]