Re: [PATCH 00/13] mingw unicode environment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stepan Kasal <kasal@xxxxxx> writes:

> If anyone thinks the resulting ordering is not OK, they can propose
> one re-order patch on top of this series.

I agree that that would be a good way to go.

> Junio wrote:
>> OK, so the series may need further re-polishing of the polishing
>> done by Stepan last-minute before sending them out.  I'll still
>
> No, it was not last minute work.  It was done several weeks ago, after some
> planning, etc.  It's my best.  Corrections welcome, though.

I did not literally mean "minute", and I am sorry if I sounded like
I was saying that you threw junk that are not well-thought-out into
the mix.

The point I wanted to clarify was that the claim to be "time proven
part of msysGit" in the first paragraph of the cover does not apply
to some of the patches in the series, in which case I shouldn't
merge it right to 'master' without waiting for responses.

In that context (I take "time proven" is like "more than 18
months"), weeks vs minutes do not make much of a difference anyway
;-).



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]