Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Santi Béjar wrote:
>
>> when a reflog entry do not have a reflog message the refs@{num} syntax
>> gives a different result than with 'git log -g'. Actually 'git log -g'
>> just skips this ref.
>
> I could be that some older git version produces empty messages. But I'd
> regard the empty messages to be the problem. Or is the current Git version
> still producing such entries?
StGIT used to produce no reflog messages; I don't know if this has improved.
But you can have old reflog entries with empty messages; git log -g should
deal with them IMHO.
--
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html