Hi,
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Santi Béjar wrote:
> On 2/8/07, Santi Béjar <sbejar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi *,
> >
> > when a reflog entry do not have a reflog message the refs@{num}
> > syntax gives a different result than with 'git log -g'. Actually 'git
> > log -g' just skips this ref.
> >
>
> Also:
>
> $ git log origin/master
>
> works, but
>
> $ git log -g origin/master
>
> does not. You have to put the remotes prefix.
I hesitate "fixing" that. I mean, if you want to know about the remote
branch "master" why not be precise? Yes, "git log" _is_ nice if you want
to be sloppy.
But if you _have_ to have it, see attached patch. I will not push for it
in time for 1.5.0, though, since I have a track record of not getting
patches right on the first try.
Ciao,
Dscho
---
reflog-walk.c | 13 +++++++++++++
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/reflog-walk.c b/reflog-walk.c
index 653ec95..430faef 100644
--- a/reflog-walk.c
+++ b/reflog-walk.c
@@ -174,6 +174,19 @@ void add_reflog_for_walk(struct reflog_walk_info *info,
branch = xstrdup(head);
}
reflogs = read_complete_reflog(branch);
+ if (!reflogs || reflogs->nr == 0) {
+ unsigned char sha1[20];
+ char *b;
+ if (dwim_ref(branch, strlen(branch), sha1, &b) == 1) {
+ if (reflogs) {
+ free(reflogs->ref);
+ free(reflogs);
+ }
+ free(branch);
+ branch = b;
+ reflogs = read_complete_reflog(branch);
+ }
+ }
if (!reflogs || reflogs->nr == 0)
die("No reflogs found for '%s'", branch);
path_list_insert(branch, &info->complete_reflogs)->util