Hi,
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Santi Béjar wrote:
> when a reflog entry do not have a reflog message the refs@{num} syntax
> gives a different result than with 'git log -g'. Actually 'git log -g'
> just skips this ref.
I could be that some older git version produces empty messages. But I'd
regard the empty messages to be the problem. Or is the current Git version
still producing such entries?
Ciao,
Dscho