Re: [PATCH 0/4] Re: [PATCH 3/4] t: rev-parse-parents: avoid yoda conditions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 06:25:45PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:

> > And I do not think it is a problem. The point of the function is not to
> > abstract away the idea of comparison. The point is to give a hook for
> > people on systems without "diff -u" to run the test suite.
> 
> The point according to whom? I say it's the other way around.

The point according to 82ebb0b (add test_cmp function for test scripts,
2008-03-12). I wish I had simply called it test_diff back then, and then
this conversation could have never occurred.

> Either way the fact that others are doing it differently doesn't mean
> that's the best way, that would be argumentum ad populum, and mothers
> are keen to remind us that if other kids are jumping the bridge, that
> doesn't mean we should too.

Did I once say "my way of thinking about it is the best way"? No. I said
"I think it is a matter of preference". I mentioned other systems using
a particular ordering to show that the set of people who prefer it the
other way is non-zero.

Feel free to respond, but I have no interest in discussing this any
further with you. This thread has become a giant time sink, and I have
nothing else to say on the matter that I have not already said.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]