Re: [PATCH 0/4] Re: [PATCH 3/4] t: rev-parse-parents: avoid yoda conditions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



John Keeping <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 09:47:12AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>> > test_cmp_rev follows the same order of arguments a "diff -u" and
>> > produces the same output as plain "git diff".  It's perfectly readable
>> > and normal.
>> 
>> This is way off tangent, but I am somewhat sympathetic to Felipe's
>> "compare actual with expect", with reservations.
>
> This isn't an argument either way, but note that JUnit (and NUnit and
> PHPUnit) all have assertEquals methods that take the arguments in the
> order "expect, actual".  I've always assumed that Git's test framework
> was imitating that,...

No.  See 82ebb0b6 (add test_cmp function for test scripts,
2008-03-12).  The "test_cmp" was a replacement for "diff -u", and
the same order we fed "diff -u", i.e. expect then actual, was
carried over.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]