On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 01:57:19PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> John Keeping <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> >> +New users are encouraged to use linkgit:git-log[1] instead. The
> >> +`whatchanged` command is essentially the same as linkgit:git-log[1]
> >> +run with different defaults that shows a --raw diff outputat the
> >
> > s/outputat/output at/
>
> Thanks.
>
> > Although I wonder if it would be better to say
> >
> > New users are encouraged to use linkgit:git-log[1] instead. The
> > `whatchanged` command is essentially the same as linkgit:git-log[1]
> > with the `--raw` option specified.
>
> But that is different from the truth, no? "git whatchanged -p" will
> not behave as if "git whatchanged -p" with the "--raw" specified.
> The 'raw' kicks in only as a default.
Hmm, I hadn't realised that specifying "-p" would disable the "--raw".
I still find the last sentence of the original patch slightly awkward
though. How about
New users are encouraged to use linkgit:git-log[1] instead. The
`whatchanged` command is essentially the same as linkgit:git-log[1]
but defaults to ``raw'' diff output and does not show merge
commits.
?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html