Re: [PATCH] whatchanged: document its historical nature

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



John Keeping <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> +New users are encouraged to use linkgit:git-log[1] instead.  The
>> +`whatchanged` command is essentially the same as linkgit:git-log[1]
>> +run with different defaults that shows a --raw diff outputat the
>
> s/outputat/output at/

Thanks.

> Although I wonder if it would be better to say
>
>     New users are encouraged to use linkgit:git-log[1] instead.  The
>     `whatchanged` command is essentially the same as linkgit:git-log[1]
>     with the `--raw` option specified.

But that is different from the truth, no?  "git whatchanged -p" will
not behave as if "git whatchanged -p" with the "--raw" specified.
The 'raw' kicks in only as a default.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]