Thomas Rast wrote: > The arguments arise to a large degree from attempting to review his > work. Not doing so is not an option, see e.g.: I don't recall saying that you shouldn't review his work (?). What I _am_ saying is that there is absolutely no point belaboring over what's wrong with Felipe's "tone", "demeanour" and "style of discussion". It has been discussed a zillion times now. You're doing it under the pretext of "agreement" and "setting a good example" (in jk's words); in reality, you're setting a bad example by showing everyone that it is okay to do the same thing (welcome jh!) and waste everyone's time. > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/223279 > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/225969 > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/226125 All these are legitimate reviews, and they and everyone's getting along just fine. What argument are you talking about? *scratches head* > And that's not even counting the part of the argument that arises purely > from deliberate flaunting of the project's guidelines. What guidelines? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html