Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>>> So let's go ahead and apply these directly on top of 'master', once >>>> we hear from Emacs folks and they are happy with it. I'll queue it >>>> on 'pu' so that I do not have to go back to the list archive when it >>>> happens. >>> >>> I already heard that everything seems to be working correctly, except >>> one feature, the biggest change, which I screwed up with a one-liner >>> commit. That's why I added a test. Anyway, I've fixed it in my github >>> branch and in this patch series, and I've told them to try the fix. >> >> Let us know when they make progress on that front. >> >> If Emacs decides to switch to Git and decides to use this version of >> remote-bzr for their conversion, or at least a nontrivial group of >> developers favor to do so, without seeing concrete technical points >> that say remote-bzr is not yet ready (e.g. "the conversion is still >> wrong and X, Y and Z needs to be fixed"), that would be a very >> welcome solid vote of confidence in favor of us going ahead with >> this. > > Seems unlikely for political reasons (isn't it always for GNU?), since > RMS is heavily involved in the decision. I am very aware of that discussion (and the original one when they decided to use bzr). That is exactly why I said "at least ... favor to do so". -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html