Re: [PATCH v2 00/18] remote-bzr: massive changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> So let's go ahead and apply these directly on top of 'master', once
>> we hear from Emacs folks and they are happy with it.  I'll queue it
>> on 'pu' so that I do not have to go back to the list archive when it
>> happens.
>
> I already heard that everything seems to be working correctly, except
> one feature, the biggest change, which I screwed up with a one-liner
> commit. That's why I added a test. Anyway, I've fixed it in my github
> branch and in this patch series, and I've told them to try the fix.

Let us know when they make progress on that front.

If Emacs decides to switch to Git and decides to use this version of
remote-bzr for their conversion, or at least a nontrivial group of
developers favor to do so, without seeing concrete technical points
that say remote-bzr is not yet ready (e.g. "the conversion is still
wrong and X, Y and Z needs to be fixed"), that would be a very
welcome solid vote of confidence in favor of us going ahead with
this.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]