On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >>> So let's go ahead and apply these directly on top of 'master', once >>> we hear from Emacs folks and they are happy with it. I'll queue it >>> on 'pu' so that I do not have to go back to the list archive when it >>> happens. >> >> I already heard that everything seems to be working correctly, except >> one feature, the biggest change, which I screwed up with a one-liner >> commit. That's why I added a test. Anyway, I've fixed it in my github >> branch and in this patch series, and I've told them to try the fix. > > Let us know when they make progress on that front. > > If Emacs decides to switch to Git and decides to use this version of > remote-bzr for their conversion, or at least a nontrivial group of > developers favor to do so, without seeing concrete technical points > that say remote-bzr is not yet ready (e.g. "the conversion is still > wrong and X, Y and Z needs to be fixed"), that would be a very > welcome solid vote of confidence in favor of us going ahead with > this. Seems unlikely for political reasons (isn't it always for GNU?), since RMS is heavily involved in the decision. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html