On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 03:06:51PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote: > On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 11:06:28AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > I've recently started looking into the possibility of having git support > > > multiple in-progress sequencers, and wanted to solicit opinions for how best to > > > do it.... The thoughts I had were: > > > > > > 1) A per branch sequence directory... > > > 2) Augment the git-stash command... > > > > 3) A per branch working tree. > > > > That is how I would do this myself, anyway ;-) > > > Not sure I completely follow. Are you suggesting that all untracked > files, indexes and meta data in .git be saved during a branch switch? > > Thanks > Neil > > -- Scratch that, after some digging I located the git-new-workdir script in the contrib directory, which does what we're talking about here. Thanks! Neil > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html