On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 11:06:28AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > I've recently started looking into the possibility of having git support > > multiple in-progress sequencers, and wanted to solicit opinions for how best to > > do it.... The thoughts I had were: > > > > 1) A per branch sequence directory... > > 2) Augment the git-stash command... > > 3) A per branch working tree. > > That is how I would do this myself, anyway ;-) > Not sure I completely follow. Are you suggesting that all untracked files, indexes and meta data in .git be saved during a branch switch? Thanks Neil -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html