Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I've recently started looking into the possibility of having git support > multiple in-progress sequencers, and wanted to solicit opinions for how best to > do it.... The thoughts I had were: > > 1) A per branch sequence directory... > 2) Augment the git-stash command... 3) A per branch working tree. That is how I would do this myself, anyway ;-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html