Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: >> >>> I'd really to have that final 'git continue' in Git 2.0. Can someone >>> attempt to break up the migration path into manageable logical steps >>> that we can start working on? >> >> Is there any deadline or migration path needed? Depending on the >> design, it might be possible to do without backward-incompatible >> changes, meaning the migration path is "whatever someone feels like >> implementing first lands first". > > FWIW, I am not convinced yet why we would even want "git continue" > in the first place, so I won't be the one who would be suggesting a > migration path. Okay, I'm confused now. You were the one who suggested a unified "git continue" in the first place, if my memory serves me right. Why are you doubting it now? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html