Re: [BUG?] rebase -i: edit versus unmerged changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrew Wong wrote:
> On 3/19/13, Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I know that this is expected behavior, but is there an easy way to get
>> rid of this inconsistency?
>
> You can actually rely on "rebase" to run the appropriate command.

Didn't Junio explicitly mention that this is undesirable earlier (from
the point of view of `rebase -i` design)?  The printed advice too,
says that you should use `commit --amend` to finish the job before
invoking --continue.  Also IIRC, we don't allow --continue after
staging changes in the sequencer.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]