Re: [BUG?] rebase -i: edit versus unmerged changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
>
>> I'd really to have that final 'git continue' in Git 2.0.  Can someone
>> attempt to break up the migration path into manageable logical steps
>> that we can start working on?
>
> Is there any deadline or migration path needed?  Depending on the
> design, it might be possible to do without backward-incompatible
> changes, meaning the migration path is "whatever someone feels like
> implementing first lands first".

FWIW, I am not convinced yet why we would even want "git continue"
in the first place, so I won't be the one who would be suggesting a
migration path.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]