Re: Millisecond precision in timestamps?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>:
> But I really wonder if anybody actually cares about adding sub-second
> timestamp support, or if it is merely "because SVN has it".

There's actually one possible other reason to care.  1-second granularity 
isn't quite fine enough to guarantee that a (committer, timestamp)
pair is a unique key.  1 microsecond granularity would be.
-- 
		<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]