Re: Millisecond precision in timestamps?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Eric S. Raymond <esr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> fsck_ident() in fsck.c rejects anything but " [1-9][0-9]* " after
>> the author and committer ident (i.e. the timestamp has to be
>> integral number of seconds since the epoch, not before it, nor
>> with fractional seconds).
>
> Is this architecturally significant?  It sounds like another
> implementation detail.

Well... if we added a fractional seconds to a commit, older versions
of Git will scream loudly and refuse to work with the new commit. That
would create a fork of Git.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]