Re: [PATCH 5/9] Refactor excluded and path_excluded

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Thiago Farina <tfransosi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>
>>>> We could introduce exclude_path() and kill path_excluded() then. There
>>>> are just about 5-6 call sites to replace.
>>>
>>> The name path_excluded(... path ...) sounds like it is asking a
>>> yes/no question "is this path excluded?", which actually is what is
>>> going on.
>>>
>>> The name exclude_path(... path ...) sounds as if you are requesting
>>> somebody to exclude the path.  Does that meaning match the semantics
>>> of the function?
>>
>> I'm not great at naming. And path_excluded() cannot be reused to avoid
>> problems with other ongoing series if any. So path_is_excluded()?
>
> is_path_excluded()?

Good too.
-- 
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]