Re: t5000-tar-tree.sh failing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Dec 21, 2006, at 1:59 PM, Uwe Kleine-Koenig wrote:

I'm not sure if (in this case) a missing unzip should be as silent as
you suggest. The danger is, that s.o. makes a change, runs `make test`
and is then conviced that nothing broke.  So I think that the test
should fail, but with a more descriptive error than it is now.

The downside is, you need unzip, svn, what ever more to run the test
suite.

I was attempting to say that if we're skipping tests we should say so, and not just drop them silently like the code that Johannes posted. Really, I guess the ideal would be for there to be a test harness that would run all the tests and report skips and errors in a report at the end rather than in the middle.

~~ Brian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]