Re: cloning the kernel - why long time in "Resolving 313037 deltas"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Marco Roeland <marco.roeland@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tuesday December 19th 2006 at 03:32 Shawn Pearce wrote:
> 
> > > Anyway, try the pread() version first, see if that fixes the OS X problem.
> > 
> > It does.  Without pread() (aka stock 'next') it takes me over an
> > hour to index a pack of linux-2.6.  With pread() its 1m6s to run
> > index-pack on the same pack file.  The indexes are (of course)
> > identically produced.
> 
> I see the same here. From an (estimated) time of 37 minutes down to 52
> seconds with the pread() patch. Running the profiler (shark) on the old
> version showed that 85% of the time was spent in the Mac OS X mmap()
> system call.

More testing on Linux is probably needed, but if using pread()
on Linux is breakeven or slightly faster (as suggested by Johannes'
LilyPond test) this 60x performance improvement on initial clone
of largish projects on Mac OS X would be nice to have.

Not that I personally frequently clone large projects on Mac OS X.
But new users to Git might.  :-)

-- 
Shawn.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]