Re: cloning the kernel - why long time in "Resolving 313037 deltas"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Shawn Pearce wrote:
> > 
> > Why isn't git-index-pack doing the same?  Is there some hidden glitch
> > in some OS somewhere that has a problem with overmapping a file and
> > appending into it via write()?  I've done that on Mac OS X, Linux,
> > BSDi, Solaris...  never had a problem.
> 
> It works on modern systems, but at least old HPUX versions had 
> non-coherent mmap() and write(), and POSIX does not guarantee it. And if 
> you ever want to port to Windows, I don't think you should do it.
> 
> Anyway, try the pread() version first, see if that fixes the OS X problem.

It does.  Without pread() (aka stock 'next') it takes me over an
hour to index a pack of linux-2.6.  With pread() its 1m6s to run
index-pack on the same pack file.  The indexes are (of course)
identically produced.

-- 
Shawn.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]