Re: cloning the kernel - why long time in "Resolving 313037 deltas"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "Linus" == Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx> writes:

>> So that *was* a local delay.

Linus> Ok, interesting. Two questions:

Linus>  - what does "top" say (is it CPU-bound? Is it perhaps blowing out your 
Linus>    disk cache? Is it swapping?)

Not swapping, but CPU bound.

Linus>  - do you have "oprofile" (or even just pgprof) to see where the *hell* 
Linus>    that time is spent, if it's actually CPU?

I'm a "bear of very little brane" regarding code development on OSX.  I
can ask around to see if there's someway to profile this.

Linus> You're running this under OS X, aren't you? It's a pig of an OS, but 
Linus> "almost one hour" vs "25 seconds" is still unreasonable.

I agree!

-- 
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]