Re: git-subtree Ready #2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



greened@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (David A. Greene) writes:

> Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Should we filter-branch or rebase the history first, or just leave it as is?
>>
>> Like I said, since I don't expect there to be any more back-and-forth
>> development, rebasing should be pretty harmless.
>
> Catching up on e-mail.  :)
>
> I'm happy to do either (rebase or filter-branch).  Just let me know.

I would understand Avery's "should we filter-branch/rebase, or is it OK
as-is?", but I do not understand what you mean by "either rebase or
filter-branch is fine".

> I'm about the send the test-lib.sh patch separately...

Thanks, this I understand and should not be a part of git-subtree topic.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]