Re: git-subtree Ready #2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> Overall I agree that there's little benefit in preserving the history,
>> at least as far as I can see, *except* that some code changes were
>> submitted by people other than me and squashing those changes might
>> conceivably cause licensing confusion down the road.
>
> That is a good point, and it sounds like a good enough justification to
> merge with history, at least for me.

Should we filter-branch or rebase the history first, or just leave it as is?

Like I said, since I don't expect there to be any more back-and-forth
development, rebasing should be pretty harmless.

Avery
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]