Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>> Overall I agree that there's little benefit in preserving the history,
>>> at least as far as I can see, *except* that some code changes were
>>> submitted by people other than me and squashing those changes might
>>> conceivably cause licensing confusion down the road.
>>
>> That is a good point, and it sounds like a good enough justification to
>> merge with history, at least for me.
>
> Should we filter-branch or rebase the history first, or just leave it as is?
>
> Like I said, since I don't expect there to be any more back-and-forth
> development, rebasing should be pretty harmless.
Catching up on e-mail. :)
I'm happy to do either (rebase or filter-branch). Just let me know.
I'm about the send the test-lib.sh patch separately as it's a prereq for
putting git-subtrees tests in contrib and I think it's generally useful
anyway.
-Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html